[1]黄学勇,高茂生,侯国华,等.黄河三角洲南部宁海—西双河叶瓣潮滩沉积物粒度特征与季节变化分析[J].华东地质,2021,42(02):229-238.[doi:10.16788/j.hddz.32-1865/P.2021.02.012]
 HUANG Xueyong,GAO Maosheng,HOU Guohua,et al.Grain size characteristics and seasonal variation of the Ninghai-Xishuanghe lobe tidal flat sediments in southern Yellow River Delta[J].East China Geology,2021,42(02):229-238.[doi:10.16788/j.hddz.32-1865/P.2021.02.012]
点击复制

黄河三角洲南部宁海—西双河叶瓣潮滩沉积物粒度特征与季节变化分析()
分享到:

《华东地质》[ISSN:2096-1871/CN:32-1865/P]

卷:
42
期数:
2021年02期
页码:
229-238
栏目:
海洋地质专题
出版日期:
2021-08-18

文章信息/Info

Title:
Grain size characteristics and seasonal variation of the Ninghai-Xishuanghe lobe tidal flat sediments in southern Yellow River Delta
作者:
黄学勇1 高茂生23 侯国华23 张戈1 党显璋23
1. 辽宁师范大学地理科学学院, 辽宁 大连 116029;
2. 中国地质调查局湿地生物地质重点实验室, 山东 青岛 266071;
3. 中国地质调查局青岛海洋地质研究所, 山东 青岛 266071
Author(s):
HUANG Xueyong1 GAO Maosheng23 HOU Guohua23 ZHANG Ge1 DANG Xianzhang23
1. School of Geography Science, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, Liaoning, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Coastal Wetland Biogeosciences, CGS, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, China;
3. Qingdao Institute of Marine Geology, CGS, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, China
关键词:
宁海—西双河叶瓣潮滩粒度丰、枯季节黄河三角洲
Keywords:
Ninghai-Xishuanghe lobetidal flatgrain sizewet and dry seasonsYellow River Delta
分类号:
P736.4
DOI:
10.16788/j.hddz.32-1865/P.2021.02.012
摘要:
根据15个表层沉积物丰、枯季粒度数据,综合运用Pejrup粒度三角图、粒径-标准偏差曲线以及粒度参数分析法,对现代黄河三角洲南部宁海—西双河叶瓣潮滩丰、枯季沉积物粒度特征进行了分析。结果表明:沉积物粒度存在季节性变化,且空间分布不同。丰季由于降水量大,总体沉积环境相对稳定;枯季沉积环境相对动荡,受现代黄河影响明显。粒度参数相互关系显示,沉积物在形成前经历了较长时间的分选,物质来源多样性与潮滩动力关系不大,且丰季与枯季物质来源不同。对比丰季和枯季沉积环境函数值,发现丰季受潮汐余流影响较强,以浅海沉积为主;枯季在黄河及沿岸河流影响下,以河流(三角洲)沉积为主。
Abstract:
According to the grain size data of 15 groups of surface sediment samples in wet and dry seasons, the methods of Pejrup grain size triangle, grain size-standard deviation curve and grain size parameter analysis are used to analyze the sedimentary characteristics of Ninghai-Xishuanhe lobe tidal flat in the south of modern Yellow River Delta in wet and dry seasons. The results indicate that the grain size of sediments change with season and the spatial distribution is different as well. Due to the large precipitation in wet season, the general sedimentary environment is stable, while the sedimentary environment in dry season is relatively turbulent, more obviously affected by the modern Yellow River. The correlation of grain size parameters shows that the sediments undergo long-time sorting before formation. The diversity of material sources has little to do with tidal flat dynamics, and the material sources are different in wet and dry seasons. By comparing the function values of sedimentary environment in wet and dry seasons, it is found that the wet season is strongly affected by tidal residual current, with neritic sediments dominated, while the dry season is dominated by fluvial (delta) deposits under the influence of Yellow River and nearby rivers.

参考文献/References:

[1] 周良勇, 高茂生, 徐刚, 等. 黄河三角洲潮滩的侵蚀和再沉积:示踪砂棒法的应用[J]. 地质通报, 2014, 33(10):1602-1608.
[2] 蒋仁, 曾剑威, 刘凯, 等.江苏洋口港地区埋藏古潮成砂脊年代学特征及古环境意义[J]. 华东地质, 2019, 40(1):11-18.
[3] 陶春军, 贾十军, 陈富荣, 等.安徽北淮阳沙坪沟钼矿区水系沉积物粒级试验研究[J]. 华东地质, 2017, 38(1):58-65.
[4] 蔡雄飞, 罗中杰.湘西北张家界四都坪陡山沱组沉积特征新发现及古地理意义[J]. 华东地质, 2018, 39(1):11-17.
[5] 庞家珍, 司书亨.黄河河口演变——Ⅰ.近代历史变迁[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 1979, 10(2):136-141.
[6] 高善明, 李元芳, 安凤桐, 等.黄河三角洲形成和沉积环境[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 1989:51-91.
[7] QIAO S Q, SHI X F, SAITO Y, et al. Sedimentary records of natural and artificial Huanghe (Yellow River) channel shifts during the Holocene in the southern Bohai Sea[J]. Continental Shelf Research, 2011, 31(13):1336-1342.
[8] CUI B L, LI X Y. Coastline change of the Yellow River estuary and its response to the sediment and runoff (1976-2005)[J]. Geomorphology, 2011, 127(1/2):32-40.
[9] 成国栋, 任于灿, 李绍全, 等. 现代黄河三角洲河道演变及垂向序列[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 1986, 6(2):1-15.
[10] 杨怀仁, 王建. 黄河三角洲地区第四纪海进与岸线变迁[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 1990, 10(3):1-14.
[11] ZHOU L Y, LIU J, SAITO Y, et al. Modern sediment characteristics and accumulation rates from the delta front to prodelta of the Yellow River (Huanghe)[J]. Geo-Marine Letters, 2016, 36(4):247-258.
[12] 王奎峰, 李念春, 王薇.黄河三角洲多年海岸线动态变迁特征及演化规律[J]. 应用海洋学学报, 2018, 37(3):330-338.
[13] 李广雪, 刘守全, 姜玉池, 等. 黄河三角洲北部海底刺穿初步研究[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 1999, 29(4):379-384.
[14] 林维田, 吴永亭, 刘建立. 广利港河道水位变化及河口拦门沙地形变化分析研究[J]. 海岸工程, 2008, 27(3):9-14.
[15] 陈静, 冯秀丽, 李安龙, 等. 广利港口拦门沙航道开挖后淤积强度预测[J]. 海洋科学, 2003, 27(6):47-50.
[16] 刘爱菊, 李坤平, 黄易畅. 广利河口至港池段潮波的传播及变形[J]. 黄渤海海洋, 1989, 8(2):94-99.
[17] 黄学勇, 张戈, 高茂生, 等. 现代黄河口南岸海洋沉积环境分析[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2019, 35(1):12-21.
[18] 黄学勇, 张戈, 高茂生, 等. 广利河口北潮滩重金属分布特征及评价[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2018, 34(9):43-50.
[19] 于永海, 张盼, 林霞, 等. 莱州湾现代沉积特征及中全新世以来沉积环境演变研究[M]. 南京:河海大学出版社, 2017:1-50.
[20] 杨荣民, 李广雪, 李安龙, 等.广利河口拦门沙的沉积特征与冲淤过程的研究[J]. 中国海洋大学学报:自然科学版, 2005, 35(2):339-343.
[21] 王庆, 王小鲁, 李雪艳, 等. 黄河三角洲南部废弃三角洲潮间滩涂表层沉积粒度特征及其粗化现象[J]. 第四纪研究, 2017, 37(2):353-367.
[22] UDDEN J A. Mechanical composition of clastic sediments[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1914, 25(1):655-744.
[23] WENTWORTH C K. A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments[J]. Journal of Geology, 1922, 30(5):377-392.
[24] BLOTT S J, PYE K. GRADISTAT:a grain size distribution and statistics package for the analysis of unconsolidated sediments[J]. Earth Surface Processes & Landforms, 2001, 26(11):1237-1248.
[25] PEJRUP M. The triangle diagram used for classification of estuarine sediments:a new app roach[M]//Tidal-influenced Sedimentary Environments and Facies. Dordrecht:Reidel Publishing Company, 1988:289-300.
[26] 孙有斌, 高抒, 李军.边缘海陆源物质中环境敏感粒度组分的初步分析[J]. 科学通报, 2003, 48(1):83-86.
[27] 陈桥, 刘东艳, 陈颖军, 等.粒级-标准偏差法和主成分因子分析法在粒度敏感因子提取中的对比[J]. 地球与环境, 2013, 41(3):319-325.
[28] SAHU B K. Depositonal mechanisms from the size analysis of clastic sediments[J]. Journal of sedimentary Petrology, 1964, 34(1):73-83.
[29] FRIEDMAN G M. Distinction between dune, beach and river sands from their textural characteristics[J]. Sedimentary Petrology, 1961, 31(4):514-529.
[30] FOLK R L, WARD W C. A study in a significance of grain size parameters[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 1957, 27(1):3-26.
[31] 赵保仁, 庄国文, 曹德明, 等. 渤海的环流、潮余流及其对沉积物分布的影响[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 1995, 26(5):466-473.
[32] 黄大吉, 苏纪兰, 张立人. 渤海冬夏季环流的数值研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 1998, 16(1):115-121.
[33] 李国胜, 王海龙, 李柏良. 渤海风驱-潮致拉格朗日余流的数值模拟与季相时空变异[J]. 地理研究, 2005, 24(3):359-370.
[34] 刘桂卫, 黄海军, 刘艳霞, 等. 风暴潮前后莱州湾西岸岸滩演化特征研究[J]. 海洋科学集刊, 2010, 50:32-39.
[35] 陈炳安.小清河河口近海区泥沙动态分析[J]. 海洋通报, 1982(5):60-73.

相似文献/References:

[1]顾 佳,闫玉茹,平利姣.南通近海潮滩表层沉积物重金属含量特征与生态风险评价[J].华东地质,2017,38(02):155.[doi:10.16788/j.hddz.32-1865/P.2017.02.010]
 GU Jia,YAN Yu-ru,PING Li-jiao.Characteristics and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in tidal flat surface sediments of the Nantong coastal zone[J].East China Geology,2017,38(02):155.[doi:10.16788/j.hddz.32-1865/P.2017.02.010]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2020-03-04;改回日期:2020-09-14。
基金项目:国家自然科学基金"晚更新世以来莱州湾地下卤水成因及恢复性研究(编号:41977173)"、科技部基础性工作专项"我国典型潮间带沉积物质量本底调查及图集编研 (编号:2014FY210600)"、国家重点研发专项"沿海地区海水入侵现状调查评价(编号:2016YFC0402801)"和中国地质调查局 "渤海湾西部等重点海岸带综合地质调查(编号:DD20160144)"项目联合资助。
作者简介:黄学勇,1991年生,男,硕士研究生,自然地理学专业。Email:hxyong@21CN.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01