[1]李剑锋,朱玉晨,刘春雷,等.晋江流域生态环境脆弱性评价[J].华东地质,2022,43(01):94-101.[doi:10.16788/j.hddz.32-1865/P.2022.01.010]
　LI Jianfeng,ZHU Yuchen,LIU Chunlei,et al.Vulnerability assessment of ecological environment of Jinjiang River Basin[J].East China Geology,2022,43(01):94-101.[doi:10.16788/j.hddz.32-1865/P.2022.01.010]
点击复制

晋江流域生态环境脆弱性评价()
分享到：

《华东地质》[ISSN:2096-1871/CN:32-1865/P]

卷:
43
期数:
2022年01期
页码:
94-101
栏目:
专辑
出版日期:
2022-03-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Vulnerability assessment of ecological environment of Jinjiang River Basin
作者:
李剑锋1; 2;  朱玉晨1;  刘春雷1;  李亚松1;  郝奇琛1; 2;  李政红2
1. 中国地质科学院水文地质环境地质研究所, 河北 石家庄 050061;
2. 自然资源部地下水科学与工程重点实验室, 河北 石家庄 050061
Author(s):
LI Jianfeng1; 2;  ZHU Yuchen1;  LIU Chunlei1;  LI Yasong1;  HAO Qichen1; 2;  LI Zhenghong2
1. Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Shijiazhuang 050061, Hebei, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Groundwater Sciences and Engineering, Ministry of Natural Resources, CAGS, Shijiazhuang 050061, Hebei, China
关键词:
晋江流域; 脆弱性评价; 聚类分析; Getis-Ord Gi*统计模型; Calinski-Harabasz指数评价聚类模型; 茶叶种植空间优化
Keywords:
Jinjiang River Basin; vulnerability assessment; cluster analysis; Getis-Ord Gi* statistical model; Calinski-Harabasz index evaluation clustering model; optimization of tea planting
分类号:
X171.1
DOI:
10.16788/j.hddz.32-1865/P.2022.01.010
摘要:
针对晋江流域的生态地质问题，应用Getis-Ord Gi*统计模型、Calinski-Harabasz指数评价聚类模型等评价方法，从脆弱性分级、主控因素、聚集特征三方面开展脆弱性评价，建立晋江流域生态环境脆弱性评价模型。整体来看，晋江流域西溪比东溪脆弱，上游比下游脆弱；晋江流域东南部城市聚集区脆弱性的主控因素为建筑用地、初级生产力与土壤有机质，中西部茶叶种植区的主控因素为茶叶的过度种植；脆弱性高值聚集区域在安溪县感德镇以及永春县湖洋镇一带。在上述分析的基础上，对晋江流域茶园种植分布现状合理性进行评估，给出具体的茶园空间优化建议。
Abstract:
In view of the increasingly prominent ecological geological problems in Jinjiang River Basin, it is urgent to strengthen the protection of ecological environment and carry out ecological environment vulnerability assessment, which can provide decision-making basis for ecological environment protection. The vulnerability assessment model of ecological environment system in Jinjiang River Basin is established. Using Getis-Ord GI* statistical model, Calinski-Harabasz index evaluation clustering model and other evaluation methods, vulnerability assessment is carried out from three aspects:vulnerability classification, main control factors and aggregation characteristics. The results show that in terms of vulnerability, Xixi is more vulnerable than Dongxi, and the upstream is more vulnerable than the downstream. In terms of main controlling factors, the main controlling factors of vulnerability in the southeast plain of Jinjiang River Basin are construction land, primary productivity and soil organic matter. The main controlling factor of vulnerability in Central and Western China is tea planting. In terms of aggregation characteristics, high vulnerability aggregation areas are Gande town of Anxi County and Huyang Town of Yongchun County. Based on the above analysis, the rationality of the current situation of tea plantation distribution in Jinjiang River Basin is evaluated, and specific suggestions for tea plantation spatial optimization are given.

参考文献/References:

[1] 高杨. 晋江西溪流域环境变化的水文响应研究[D]. 福州:福建师范大学,2009. GAO Y. Hydrological response to environmental change in xixi watershed of Jinjiang river[D]. Fuzhou:Fujian Normal University,2009.
[2] 陆海燕.新疆生态脆弱性评价研究[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学,2020. LU H Y. Study on ecological vulnerability assessment in xinjiang[D]. Urumqi:Xinjiang Agricultural University,2020.
[3] 任源鑫, 林青, 韩婷,等. 陕西省水资源脆弱性评价[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(2):231-236. REN Y X,LIN Q,HAN T, et al. Evaluation on the vulnerability of water resources in Shaanxi Pro-vince[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 27(2):231-236.
[4] 王贝贝,丁明军,管琪卉,等.基于格网的南昌市生态环境脆弱性评价[J].生态学报,2019(15):5460-5472. WANG B B,DING M J, GUAN Q H, et al. Gridded assessment of eco-environmental vulnerability in Nanchang City[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019(15):5460-5472.
[5] 张慧琳, 吴攀升, 侯艳军. 五台山地区生态脆弱性评价及其时空变化[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2020,3(8):1026-1035. ZHANG H L,WU P S,HOU Y J. Ecological vulnerability assessment and its temporal and spatial changes in Wutai mountain area[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2020,3(8):1026-1035.
[6] 周玲美,王世航,权玲. 基于遥感和地理信息系统的内蒙古呼日查干淖尔地区生态脆弱性评价[J]. 生态与农村环境学报,2021,37(4):484-491. ZHOU L M,WANG S H,QUAN L. Ecological vulnerability assessment in huri chagannoor of Inner Mongolia based on rs and gis technology[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2021,37(4):484-491.
[7] POLSKY C, NEFF R, YARNAL B. Building comparable global change vulnerability assessments:The vulnerability scoping diagram[J]. Global Environ-mental Change, 2007, 17(3-4):472-485.
[8] 黄炎, 陈国光, 李雪平. 武夷山茶叶品质与土壤地球化学背景特征关系探讨[J]. 华东地质, 2020,41(2):166-176. HUANG Y, CHEN G G,LI X P. Discussion on the relationship between Wuyishan tea quality and geochemistry background characteristics[J]. East China Geology, 2020,41(2):166-176.
[9] 李平星,樊杰. 基于VSD模型的区域生态系统脆弱性评价——以广西西江经济带为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014,5(29):49-58. LI P X,FAN J. Regional ecological vulnerability assessment based on vsd model:a case study of Xijiang river economic belt in Guangxi[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2014, 5(29):49-58.
[10] 尚嘉宁,邵怀勇,李峰,等.金沙江流域生态脆弱性评价[J].湖北农业科学,2021,60(8):50-54. SHANG J N,SHAO H Y,LI F,et al. Assessment of ecological vulnerability in Jinsha river basin[J].Hubei Agricultural Sciences,2021,60(8):50-54.
[11] 贾晶晶, 赵军, 王建邦,等. 基于SRP模型的石羊河流域生态脆弱性评价[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2020, 34(1):36-43. JIA J J,ZHAO J,WANG J B, et al. Ecological vulnerability assessment of Shiyang river basin based on SRP model[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2020, 34(1):36-43.
[12] 泉州市水利局. 2018福建省水资源公报[EB/OL]. (2019-07-30)[2021-08-09].http://slj.quanzhou.gov.cn/zwgk/ghjh/201908/t20190822_1947845.htm. Quanzhou Water Resources Bureau. 2018 Fujian Water Resources Bulletin[EB/OL]. (2019-07-30)[2021-08-09]. http://slj.quanzhou.gov.cn/zwgk/ghjh/201908/t20190822_1947845.htm.
[13] NASA. New Version of the ASTER GDEM[EB/OL].[EB/OL]. (2020-03-03)[2021-08-09].https://earthdata.nasa.gov/learn/articles/new-aster-gdem.
[14] 中国科学院南京土壤研究所. 中国土壤科学数据库[EB/OL]. (2019-03-17)[2021-08-09].http://vdb3.soil.csdb.cn/. Institute of Soil Science,Chinese Academy of Sciences. China Soil Science Database[EB/OL]. (2019-03-17)[2021-08-09]. http://vdb3.soil.csdb.cn/.
[15] 戴永久, 上官微. 中国土壤有机质数据集[EB/OL]. (2018-07-23)[2021-08-09].https://geodata.pku.edu.cn/index.php?c=content&a=show&id=416. DAI Y J, SHANGGUAN W. Chinese soil organic matter data set[EB/OL]. (2018-07-23)[2021-08-09].https://geodata.pku.edu.cn/index.php?c=content&a=show&id=416.
[16] 北京大学城市与环境学院. 北京大学城市与环境学院地理数据平台[EB/OL] (2018-07-23)[2021-08-09].http://geodata.pku.edu.cn. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences. Geographic data platform, School of city and environment, Peking University[EB/OL]. (2018-07-23)[2021-08-09].http://geodata.pku.edu.cn.
[17] 李勇, 唐澈, 赵华,等. 茶树耐铝聚铝特性及其机理研究进展[J]. 茶叶科学, 2018, 38(1):1-8. LI Y,TANG C,ZHAO H,et al. Advances of aluminum tolerance and accumulation in tea plant[J]. Journal of Tea Science, 2018, 38(1):1-8.
[18] ANSELIN L. Local Indicators of Spatial Association-LISA[J]. Geographical Analysis, 2010, 27(2):93-115.
[19] 骆嘉伟, 李仁发, 张白妮. 基于多维伪F统计量的基因表达动态聚类分析方法研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2006(3):586-589. LUO J W,LI R F,ZHANG B N. Study on dynamic clustering analysis method for gene expression data based on multidimension pseudo f-statistics[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2006(3):586-589.
[20] 刘文博, 梁盛楠, 余泉,等. 基于伪F统计量的属性特征降维方法研究[J]. 东北师大学报:自然科学版, 2020(1):43-49. LIU W B,LIANG S N,YU Q,et al. Attribute feature dimensionality reduction method based on pseudo f statistic[J]. Journal of Northeast Normal University:Natural Science Edition, 2020(1):43-49.
[21] CALINSKI T, HARABASZ J. A dendrite method for cluster analysis[J]. Communications in Statistics,1974,3(1):1-27.
[22] 文锡梅, 陆洋, 兰安军,等. 无公害茶园地的空间分析及土地适宜性综合评价——以贵定县为例[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012,28(2):265-272. WEN X M,LU Y,LAN A J,et al. Space analysis and land suitability comprehensive evaluation of pollution-free tea plantation-Acase study of guiding county, guizhou province[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2012,28(2):265-272.
[23] 杨高, 李颖, 付波霖,等. 基于遥感的河岸带生态修复效应定量评估——以辽河干流为例.[J]. 水利学报, 2018, 49(5):608-618. YANG G,LI Y,FU B L,et al. Quantitative evaluation of riparian ecological restoration in Liao river based on remote sensing.[J]. Journal Of Hydraulic Engi-neering, 2018, 49(5):608-618.

相似文献/References:

[1]朱玉晨,李剑锋,郝奇琛,等.福建晋江流域锰负荷分布及源区识别[J].华东地质,2022,43(01):113.[doi:10.16788/j.hddz.32-1865/P.2022.01.012]
　ZHU Yuchen,LI Jianfeng,HAO Qichen,et al.Spatial distribution and source identification of manganese load in Jinjiang watershed, Fujian Province[J].East China Geology,2022,43(01):113.[doi:10.16788/j.hddz.32-1865/P.2022.01.012]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-08-09;改回日期:2021-10-12。
基金项目:中国地质调查局"厦漳泉同城化地区综合地质调查（编号：DD20190303）"项目资助。
作者简介:李剑锋,1984年生,男,助理研究员,博士,主要从事定量地学研究。Email:lichris99@foxmail.com。
通讯作者:朱玉晨,1986年生,男,助理研究员,硕士,主要从事地理信息系统及数值模拟研究。Email:zhuyuchen413@163.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01